New entry (Programming Questions): 'Why doesn't gdb handle signals?'
This commit is contained in:
parent
53d1fe2a5c
commit
738c2431e5
|
@ -1251,6 +1251,14 @@ for signal/process handling-related info, to name two. The strace
|
||||||
mechanism is well documented in the Cygwin library sources in the file
|
mechanism is well documented in the Cygwin library sources in the file
|
||||||
<CODE>winsup/include/sys/strace.h</CODE>.
|
<CODE>winsup/include/sys/strace.h</CODE>.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@subsection Why doesn't gdb handle signals?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Unfortunately, there is only minimal signal handling support in gdb
|
||||||
|
currently. Signal handling only works with Windows-type signals.
|
||||||
|
SIGINT may work, SIGFPE may work, SIGSEGV definitely does. You cannot
|
||||||
|
'stop', 'print' or 'nopass' signals like SIGUSR1 or SIGHUP to the
|
||||||
|
process being debugged.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@subsection The linker complains that it can't find something.
|
@subsection The linker complains that it can't find something.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@strong{(Please note: This section has not yet been updated for the latest
|
@strong{(Please note: This section has not yet been updated for the latest
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue